A paragron of impartiality

Still got some room in your inbox? Place your email address into the box on the right to receive automatic Gabrielquotes updates!

With all this Returning Officer business, I’ve become rather an expert in the art of being impartial. And this groundswell of experience has enabled me to notice that one of my lecturers isn’t exactly neutral.

I’m not going to provide their name, but if I drop the hint that they lecture in International Relations and that they’re a far-left nutter, I think you’ll probably guess. (No I won’t. -Ed.)

For instance:

ben-selwyn-sussexWhat a charming generalisation. I assume that this lecturer receives their salary in cash…

He also opined, “The end of capital controls was akin to inviting Hitler and Stalin over for dinner” (I do love comparisons between monetary policy and genocide), and, “You may say the death penalty is awful but it’s a very effective method of economic management.” Yes. I do.

However, you’ll be pleased to hear that the seminar is a source of balance and counter-argument, and my seminar tutor is a even-handed, objective lady whose reasonableness knows no bounds: “Honestly, I can accept substantiated arguments but not something based on Milton Friedman. For Christ’s sake…” Yeah; I hate it when people quote Nobel Prize-winning academics in a university.

In other Sussex news, one of my professors used a lecture about the European Court of Justice to tell some long, meandering anecdote which ended with the punchline:
“I am thinking, how many more species of cheese may have vanished throughout the EU because they did not have the good fortune to be tasted by the Director-General of Legal Services?”

What a terrifying thought.

Eastleigh fallout latest


Whatever David Cameron says, it looks like the Conservative Party sat-nav is saying:

The Justice Secretary hopes that by withdrawing from the European Convention on Human Rights, we can avoid giving prisoners the right to vote as Strasbourg judges ordered us to in 2005.

I actually have zero sympathy for these whining prisoners who think it’s unfair that the state forces them to choose between committing crimes and voting – they’re no more victims of a human rights abuse than members of the House of Lords, who, just like criminals, have also made a voluntary lifestyle choice which resulted in them losing the vote – but clearly, if the European Court of Human Rights has told us to change this then we have to.

Or did Britain sign up to the Convention only on condition that it wouldn’t affect what we were going to do anyway?


There’s nothing left

Online-CensorshipLast week this blog received a couple of comments from someone who, in an attempt to preserve their incognito, used an email address belonging to an organisation called Riseup, a shadowy front which “provides online communication tools for people and groups working on liberatory social change.”

All quite laudable, in principle; liberatory social change is a perfectly decent goal, naming no Police Commissioners.

But Riseup’s terms of service contain one rather unusual clause: “We ask that you do not use Riseup services for any of the following: […] support for capitalism.”

Especially if you’re using them from an iPhone…

(Z)F off!

I’ve been a bit short of time this week so have just adapted a news article from last week to fit new circumstances. Sorry for any confusion.


Liberal election victories? (II)

from the desk of sir georgeMy heartiest congratulations to Mr Michael Thornton of Eastleigh: serving as a Liberal MP is not the easy experience that it used to be, and if I am to be truthful I did have several non-specific concerns about whether our gallant party would win last week’s by-election at all.

The news reached me on Friday evening with my Indian take-away, my Indian take-away being a native of Pondicherry whom I took away with me after my last tour of duty to assist me with my literary endeavours such as this.

Many men have asked me how it is that I became involved in politics. Well; it may surprise them to hear that my career has not always been an unbridled success. Strange indeed that someone who has governed swathes of India should encounter difficulties in securing a seat in Parliament, but behold the tale of My First General Election:

Roll the 6.5 metres of credits
In tonight’s episode, the Sussex School of Global Studies will be moving building over the summer, relocating to one further to the left. The Zionist Federation confused Yachad with the PSC. This blog stood in the way of liberatory social change. This was an Gabrielquotes production.


  1. In regards of ZF as you very well know. In their statement last week on the matter of Yachad, as I’m sure you;ve read and know, The ZF shows it explicitly supports the two state solution. Members such as Meretz and Pro Zion are in the ZF- hardly a far right organisation as you erroneously suggest. Another important thing that covers the process, which involved all ZF members in regards to Yachad is here: http://zionistfederation.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/zf-response-to-yachad.html . The statement is measured and shows a willingness to engage with Yachad in the future.

    1. Perhaps, but the wide, cross-communal criticism of the ZF’s decision, across the whole of Facebook, Twitter and the Jewish media, suggests that your interpretation of this situation may be a minority one.

  2. …by the way, is there some subtlety I’m missing in the word ‘paragron’? (And probably more important, any comeback from the IS lecturers or anyone else in the uni hierarchy?)

Comments? Queries? Questions? Observations?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: