Why does the Left insist on belittling true British heroes like Officer V53?

_71653495_012618269-2[1]Education secretary Michael Gove has urged the British public to pay no heed to “left-wing myths” that the police’s killing of Mark Duggan (pictured) constituted a senseless loss of life.

“It is unpatriotic to describe the Great Shooting as anything other than an unequivocal victory for Britain,” he said.

After an inquest found last week that Duggan, 29, was “lawfully killed” by a police marksman on suspicion of not holding a gun, protests erupted around London, describing the incident as an “execution”.

But today, in a Daily Mail article entitled Why does the Left insist on belittling true British heroes like Officer V-53?, Conservative politician Gove waded into the fracas to argue that Duggan’s death was not the consequence of “a series of catastrophic mistakes perpetrated by an out-of-touch elite”.

“After proper study,” wrote the former journalist and current out-of-touch elitist, “history has reassessed the actions of V53, once held up as a trigger-happy racist. An independent analyst, known as V59, has depicted the police officer as patriotic, loyal to his commanders and always ready to enter the fray – and where there was no fray, he’d create one.”

A Metropolitan Police spokesperson, V65, said they were very flattered by Gove’s comments and would unblock the roads of his Surrey constituency immediately.

Falmer: lawyers’ paradise

Earlier this week, Sussex University was forced to reveal, under freedom of information laws, that their jolly to Brighton County Court last term – an uncontested hearing lasting less than ten minutes which resulted in an eviction order against a group of protestors who had already left voluntarily – cost £27,115.

Katharine ‘let them be executed’ Holland QC, their snooty barrister, charged £9,750; while solicitors Pinsent Masons contented themselves with a modest £15,600. The remainder was spent partly on court fees (£175) and partly, a whopping £1,590, on “other costs” – whatever they may be. Brown envelopes for judges…?

The University also confirmed that they “do not hold any information” regarding steps taken to ensure that their chosen legal advisors offered value for money, and that they did not ‘shop around’ or consider any other solicitors or barristers. Imagine my surprise.

Sussex University: investing in people, not plebs

Sussex University: investing in people, not plebs

If the government are looking to cut the wages of ‘overpaid lawyers’ who contribute nothing useful to society, perhaps they could concentrate on these swish property law types rather than overworked criminal barristers.

Indeed, to put these figures in perspective, Sussex’s lowest-paid employee earns £13,839 per year, and the University has just blown nearly twice that much over the course of a few days on a pointless court order which had no practical effect. Mazel tov. Glad my tuition fees are going towards such concrete improvements to the standard of my education.

More positive news about the involvement of lawyers at Sussex has come out in the last couple of days, though, as it’s been announced that two of the world’s leading human rights practitioners, Geoffrey Robertson QC and Paul Bowen QC, will represent the five Sussex students being disciplined later this week – Friday 17th – in front of a biased panel, charged with such heinous crimes as being in lifts and circulating petitions on the Internet. The lawyers will be giving their time for free.

I’m sure that their cross-examination of university managers will be hugely entertaining, but unfortunately, and I’m sure by complete coincidence, management have decided that this little show-trial will take place behind closed doors, just to show they have an overwhelming commitment to transparency, open justice and equality of arms.

An update will follow…

His kettle really ISN’T black.

Even flowers wilt when Nick Griffin walks past

Even flowers wilt when Nick Griffin walks past

Finally: a politician who loves Britain! Arch-racist and domestic policy goddess Nick Griffin, newly bankrupted, plans to resurrect his fortunes by starring in a cookery programme. Admittedly it’s one he commissioned and produced and uploaded to YouTube, but the idea is still about as appetising as the 15th-century “traditional British” peasant food he’s serving.

Griffin is not the first controversial politician to move into gastronomy. His predecessors include Hitler, whose series about living off the land, Mein Kampstove, proved a hit in 1930s Germany, and Lord Ashcroft, who produced the decade-long documentary Great British Tax-break Off.

"Don't let anyone tell you that I deserve the oxygen of publicity"

“Don’t let anyone tell you that I deserve the oxygen of publicity”

The BNP series is targeted at members whose “wives can’t afford to put enough decent food on the table”, perhaps because they’ve left their gender-normative husbands notwithstanding the financial consequences? Said members were treated to handy kitchen tips including, “Do take the foil off your stock cubes”, and, “Don’t let people tell you that you have to have huge numbers of immigrants to have good cooking”.

His recipe involved half a bottle of beer. “The other half,” he explained, and I think he was winking but it’s a bit hard to tell, “you drink while you’re cooking.” (Or while formulating your policies?)

While showing viewers how to cut an onion, he said: “The point of this bit… I’m showing you how to cut an onion.” Enough to make you cry…

Nick Griffin’s final comment – “You can’t say you can’t afford to cook, even if you don’t have anything at all” – suggests that his knowledge of economics is just about on par with George Osborne’s, so perhaps we should vote for him after all.

B’tei avon!

sussex-cabinet-brutality

Blistering barnacles

gabriel tintin merged copyEveryone’s favourite Belgian turned 85 last week. The first ever Tintin story was published in January 1929 in a children’s magazine as anti-Communist propaganda, but fortunately the canon soon turned its hand towards more socially-acceptable genres such as racism, sexism and extreme animal cruelty.

The 85-year-old recently became the oldest person to be certified as fit-for-work by Atos – after they came across a cartoon strip of him scaling a Nepalese mountain.

A touch more Thatcher

media-newspaper-front-pages-margaret-thatcher-1[1]Peter Bone MP may be renowned for his repeated “morbid” questions about who will take over “when the Prime Minister is killed in a terrorist attack” (!), but at least he would clearly honour his fallen leader, as he’s already proposed a law to institute a Margaret Thatcher Day bank holiday every August.

Pretty cringe-worthy, but on the plus side Bone has also introduced a Prime Minister (Replacement) Bill… which strikes me as being a very good idea indeed!

Five of the best

Today’s chefs
In tonight’s episode, Officer V53 appeared from behind a screen. Katharine Holland QC only charged so much to emphasise her point. The part of Jamie Oliver was played by Enoch Powell. Norman Tebbit was played by John Duffy. Tristram Hunt was played by Jeremy ****. Tintin was played by Gabriel Webber. This was an Gabrielquotes production.

4 comments on “Why does the Left insist on belittling true British heroes like Officer V53?

  1. ray
    15 January 2014 at 8:46pm #

    A no fly zone over the library…love it.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. I’m Sussex, I Haven’t a Clue | Gabrielquotes - 22 January 2014

    […] collapsed entirely after human rights barrister Geoffrey Robertson QC – representing the students free of charge – forced the panel to disband after pointing out that the chair, Deputy Vice-Chancellor Prof. […]

  2. Flog this | Gabrielquotes - 5 February 2015

    […] The Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education, who has the final say over students’ complaints against any university, found that Sussex’s decision to downgrade the disciplinary process to the ‘Schedule A route’ – which doesn’t allow the use of lawyers, unlike the previously-used ‘Panel route’ – had been taken “in order to prevent the students involved from being legally represented” by world-class human rights barrister Geoffrey Robertson QC. […]

  3. Trying it on with the Tribunal | Gabrielquotes - 13 March 2015

    […] this isn’t terribly unusual. In January 2014, the University admitted that it had not undertaken any assessment of the value-for-money of its decision to spend £27,115 […]

Comments? Queries? Questions? Observations?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: